Welcome to SPJ Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

Mocking and 'hocking'

Was it fair to turn New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine into a street peddler in print? (http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003677872) The Asbury Park Press illustrated a story about the state's toll roads with a picture of Corzine symbolically "hocking" (selling) cars and highways as he held open a tweed coat. (http://www.newseum.org/media/dfp/pdf25/NJ_APP.pdf) The illustration's edginess seemed better suited for an alternative weekly, but I was bothered more by how it was presented. The image was peculiar enough that someone might have known it was a computer-created compilation, but I think the disclaimer - "Photo illustration" - should have been much more prominent. The doctored image was dominant above the fold; the disclaimer was in small type below the fold. Clarity should have trumped page design.
Published Monday, December 10, 2007 5:33 AM by AndySchotz

Comments

# re: Mocking and 'hocking'

Monday, December 10, 2007 8:26 AM by Justin
Give me a break, there was nothing unclear about that page or the illustration. If we stop coddling readers and assuming they're morons, maybe they'll stop acting like they are.

# re: Mocking and 'hocking'

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:26 AM by AndySchotz
It's clear to you, and maybe many others, but I can't be sure everyone would get it. Why not be careful? What's the downside to printing "Photo illustration" right next to the illustration?

# re: Mocking and 'hocking'

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 4:13 PM by Hugh Davis

In my opinion, the photo illustration content clearly indicated a subjective, editorial point of view and suggested skullduggery perhaps even misconduct on the part of the governor. I trust the story was more balanced and, in my view, therefore more valuable to the reader. Different placement and a more accurate label (political cartoon)would better meet SPJ Ethics standards.
Anonymous comments are disabled. Please log in or create an account to comment on this article.