The Future of Academic Reference Desks
This is excerpted from the article by Todd Gilman, "The Four Habits of Highly Effective Librarians," which ran in the May 23, 2007, issue of the
Chronicle of Higher Education. I see parallels here with our continuing discussions about the future of traditional journalism. ELW
"Academic libraries today are witnessing a drastic decrease in the
number of in-depth reference questions asked at traditional reference
desks -- whether in person, by phone, through e-mail messages, or via
virtual reference systems. It's a striking trend, and even frightening
to some librarians, because we do not know the cause, what we should be
doing about it, or how it may affect staffing in the not-so-distant
future.
Are reference librarians becoming obsolete? Surely not in this age
of ever-more-complicated searching for information in ever-growing
cadres of largely idiosyncratic databases. But are reference desks
becoming obsolete? Apparently so, at least as they are currently
conceived.
So central has that question become that Columbia University 's 2007
Reference Services Symposium in March devoted a substantial portion of
the day's proceedings to a debate between two senior library
administrators over whether the academic library reference desk will
still exist five years from now ("Be it resolved: There will be no
reference desks in large academic libraries in 2012").
Based on a show of hands, the majority of listeners agreed that the
reference desk would still exist -- even after hearing all the evidence
that gave the remaining listeners pause. Or perhaps the majority
defended the reference desk's future precisely because of the evidence
they heard.
Did all of those people believe what they voted, or were they, in
part, hoping against hope -- trying to revive a dying loved one by
wishing her back to life?
Indeed, it is telling that the two debaters themselves chose to
focus exclusively on the value of the reference desk, a philosophical
question, rather than on the topic as it was given to them: the
viability of the reference desk, a practical question of supply and
demand."