Welcome to SPJ Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

SPJ and other groups oppose Kyl amendment

You will probably read about this on the FOI FYI blog as well, SPJ is one of 20 groups asking the Senate to reject an amendment that criminalizes that disclosure of classified information. Here is the letter to Sens. Leahy and Specter of the Judiciary Committee:

 

February 27, 2007

The Honorable Patrick Leahy, Chairman

The Honorable Arlen Specter, Ranking Member

Committee on the Judiciary

U.S. Senate

Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Leahy and Senator Specter:

We, the undersigned organizations, are writing to oppose a proposed amendment to S.

236 offered by Sen. Kyl. The Judiciary Committee has held no hearings or debate on the

practical or constitutional implications of this amendment that would unconstitutionally

and unnecessarily expand existing espionage statutes.

The amendment offered by Senator Kyl to S. 236 would amend Section 798(a) of Title 18

of the U.S. Code (18 U.S.C. § 798(a)), which criminalizes disclosure of communications

intelligence collection and processing methods. The amendment would broaden that

section to criminalize the disclosure to the public of any classified information

“concerning efforts by the United States to identify, investigate, or prevent terrorist

activity.” The proposed amendment is unnecessary and in our opinion would be

unconstitutionally overbroad.

Unlike the highly sensitive communications intelligence methods already covered by

section 798, the proposal would criminalize the disclosure of information that could be

classified simply at the discretion of government bureaucrats, including the possibility of

wrongdoing or illegality on the part of the government. Such discretion has repeatedly

been used to classify information crucial to the free discussion of governmental affairs

that is at the core of the First Amendment. Indeed, much of the information that would

be covered by this amendment is disclosed by the government itself in the course of

criminal proceedings or press conferences called by the Attorney General. The proposal

thus seeks to stifle, with the threat of criminal prosecution, informed public debate about

the most serious matters of the effectiveness of government counterterrorism efforts.

Section 798(a) already covers dissemination of specifically identified intelligence sources

and methods; it is a targeted provision that seeks to deter the disclosure of

communications intelligence methods, which are seen as more serious than disclosures of

other classified information. There is no justification for broadening the reach of that

section. Indeed, the purpose and effect of this proposed amendment appears to be to chill

the press and other members of the public who receive and share information

“concerning efforts by the United States to identify, investigate, or prevent terrorist

activity.” The Justice Department itself has concluded that no new legal authorities are

necessary to protect against disclosures of such information. ("I conclude that current

statutes provide a legal basis to prosecute those who engage in unauthorized disclosures,

if they can be identified." ("Report to Congress on Unauthorized Disclosures," Attorney

General John D. Ashcroft, U.S. Department of Justice, October 15, 2002.”). Thus the

amendment is unnecessary to protect classified information.

We strongly urge you to reject the proposed amendment.

Please contact Steven Aftergood (202-454-4691), Meredith Fuchs (202-994-7059) or

Kate Martin (202-721-5650), if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

American Association of University

Professors

American Booksellers Foundation for Free

Expression

American Civil Liberties Union

American Library Association

Association for Community Networking

Illinois Community Technology Coalition

Association of American Publishers

Association of Research Libraries

Californians Aware

Center for National Security Studies

Chicago Digital Access Alliance

Coalition for Civil Rights & Democratic

Liberties

Emerging Futures Network

EnviroJustice

Feminists for Free Expression

Government Accountability Project

Liberty Coalition

Media Law Resource Center

National Coalition Against Censorship

National Freedom of Information Coalition

National Security Archive

NPOTechs

OMB Watch

OpenTheGovernment.org

PEN American Center

People for the American Way

Project on Government Oversight

Federation of American Scientists, Project

on Government Secrecy,

Public Employees for Environmental

Responsibility (PEER)

ReclaimDemocracy.org

Society of American Archivists

Society of Professional Journalists

The National Press Club

Valley of the Sun Chapter (Phoenix), Society of

Professional Journalists

Washington Independent Writers (WIW)

Freedom to Write Fund

Whistleblowers USA

Elliott Freireich, Publisher

West Valley View, Litchfield Park, AZ

Stacey Remick-Simkins

Fairfax, VA 22031

Dwight E. Hines, Ph.D.

St. Augustine, Florida 32084

Cc: Senators Edward M. Kennedy, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Orrin G. Hatch, Herb Kohl,

Charles E. Grassley, Dianne Feinstein, Jon Kyl, Russell D. Feingold, Jeff Sessions,

Charles E. Schumer, Lindsey Graham, Richard J. Durbin, John Cornyn, Benjamin L.

Cardin, Sam Brownback, Sheldon Whitehouse, Tom Coburn.

Published Wednesday, February 28, 2007 2:29 PM by DaveAeikens

Comments

Anonymous comments are disabled. Please log in or create an account to comment on this article.