Welcome to SPJ Blogs
Sign in
|
Join
|
Help
This Blog
About
Email
Calendar
Apr
May 2007
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Search
Go
Syndication
RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Archives
July 2008 (1)
April 2008 (1)
March 2008 (2)
February 2008 (5)
November 2007 (1)
October 2007 (4)
September 2007 (2)
August 2007 (9)
July 2007 (16)
June 2007 (14)
May 2007 (20)
April 2007 (17)
March 2007 (22)
February 2007 (22)
January 2007 (36)
December 2006 (27)
November 2006 (14)
Navigation
Home
Blogs
Forums
Photos
Post Categories
LDF Development (3)
Protecting Sources (3)
Shield Law (2)
Subpoena (2)
SPJ Blogs
Freedom of the Prez
FOI FYI
Blogs to Watch
Photography is Not a Crime
Letter-to-the-editor libel verdict highlights legal distinction for online comments
FROM BARBARA W. WALL: LEGAL WATCH
Letter-to-the-editor libel verdict highlights legal distinction for online comments
A libel verdict awarding a prosecutor $75,000 for criminal accusations made in a published letter to the editor will not be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court. (Media Six v. Ziglar, Apr. 16, 2007.) While it was not an issue in this case, the verdict demonstrates how the law treats letters to the editor printed in the newspaper very differently from statements posted by outsiders on news media Web sites.
The libel case stemmed from a prisoner's letter to the editor published in "the buzz" – a now-defunct local tabloid in Martinsville, Va. When he sent the letter, Za'Kee Tahlib had been charged by prosecutor Joan Ziglar with murder.
READ MORE
Published Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:54 PM by
MikeKnaak
Comments
Anonymous comments are disabled. Please log in or create an account to comment on this article.