Welcome to SPJ Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

Impact 9/11 has had on American journalism

OK, so reporters have a tendency to ask big questions and demand relatively snappy answers in only minutes flat. As SPJ's new president, I'm learning in a hurry how difficult it is to sound smart on incredibly short notice while also choosing my words very, um, "carefully."

In the last couple of days, I have received calls from three journalists, including one in Africa, wanting to know how 9/11 has affected American journalism. My top answers, devoid of much elaboration, are posted below in no particular order.

What would you add to this list?

1. Many journalists all of a sudden woke up and discovered religion (particularly Islam). Belief in a higher power -- and the lack thereof -- figures into everything, including business decisions, politics and a person's stance on various social issues. Yet, far too many journalists failed to understand, much less explain, how faith figured into the subjects they tackled. Since 9/11, I have seen much more careful exploration and explanation of the role religion plays in various world affairs. Still, the American press has a long way to go on this count ... Journalists wanting greater insight into the role religion plays on every beat would be smart to consult the Religion Newswriters Association.

2. The lack of Arab and Muslim voices in American media has become more apparent to me since 9/11. Can you name one prominent Arab newspaper columnist or TV broadcaster? What about ANY Arab newspaper columnist or TV broadcaster? To American newsrooms, I say, "Let's make more of a conscious effort to hire these people, please. Every newsroom should reflect the community it serves." The National Arab American Journalists Association is happy to discuss these issues -- and provide the names of worthy job candidates.

3. In the last five years, more journalists have begun to focus on the daisy chain that includes U.S. policies on the Middle East, the world's oil and energy markets, the relationship between Israel and its neighbors and the tension often arising between Islamic and Judeo-Christian cultures. Before 9/11, these seemingly complex analyses often were delegated to a news organization's foreign correspondents. Hands off -- or of no concern -- for the men and women slogging through city meetings and pounding the streets back in the States. Not anymore.

4. 9/11 should have taught everyone in journalism a big lesson about the unflinching and unapologetic skepticism journalists should have of their government leaders. Enough said.

5. 9/11 unfortunately has ushered in some of the most serious breaches of press freedom Americans ever have seen. The number of classified documents is on the rise. The Freedom of Information Act is under attack. Overzealous federal prosecutors have been empowered to haul journalists into court, demanding that reporters and editors hand over notes and the names of confidential sources. Some lawmakers are pushing for the "Official Secrets Act" bill to clamp down on whistle-blowers. And all of this plays well with an increasingly nervous America, which appears all too willing to trade personal freedom for personal security. I can't shake this famous quote from An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Published Monday, September 11, 2006 9:58 PM by christinetatum
Filed Under:

Comments

# re: Impact 9/11 has had on American journalism

Tuesday, September 12, 2006 1:23 PM by Todd
Christie,

Cool article.  I totally agree with you on the success of the scare tactics of the current administration.  However, I also see a change
happening where people are getting tired of the "cry wolf" tactics and there seems to be a wisening up of the fact that our liberties
are eroding here in the USA.  Thanks for the insights on the Muslims, etc.  There is a muslim *** author who I have seen on
Bill Maher, but other than that, there have been very few representatives.

Todd

# re: Impact 9/11 has had on American journalism

Tuesday, September 12, 2006 5:37 PM by Amory
I completely agree with you about the inadequate coverage of religion. The inability of journalists to deftly handle theological differences on which people stake their lives leaves our country unprepared for events, whether it be a Bush presidency or 9/11. The much celebrated skepticism (if your mother says she loves you, check it out) of journalists often keeps them from being truly objective. The two principles that ocurred to me on Sept 11, 2001, were 1) Know what you believe, and 2) What is God's nature, because what the hijackers believed about these two things enabled them to rationalize mass murder. Every journalist has theological beliefs about God that rationalizes their own ethics, but they just don't realize it plays a part in what stories they find interesting.

# re: Impact 9/11 has had on American journalism

Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:57 AM by Karen
Christie:

There also are numerous indirect effects that have changed journalism since Sept. 11, 2001. In their way, they are as important as the major, direct changes. It's all cumulative, all interconnected. And so many in this second tier of problems came about because of your Nos. 4 and 5. Think "Charlotte's Web," if you will---and I'm sure that I've just maligned that beloved spider. And while they may not be directly tied to the events of Sept. 11, they came to fruition during the period after that tragedy.

For example, one indirect effect, I think is: The administration's collective thinking that it's OK to mislead the public, and use journalists to do this. Yes, I know there has been disinformation via the press for years, but it has been honed to a fine art since Sept. 11---with this administration. (And one cannot separate one from the other---Sept. 11 directly led to all this; it's the same administration, after all, that has been in charge all five years.) The paying of journalists to promote positivity and the administration's line (Olga Connor in Miami is just the latest we've learned of). And I suppose I ought to mention embedding. Yes, it got the news out on the Road to Baghdad. But it also compromised the journalistic version of the separation of church and state.

It's part and parcel of the current administration's shrillness and quick-on-the-draw responses to criticism of all kinds. Witness what was done to Helen Thomas during the White House briefings, simply because she was doing her job---questioning, questioning, questioning.

And, one cannot think of all the changes without remarking on this direct result: Journalism is again considered as despicable a career as lawyer, or maybe even worse. And because of this (and the administration's twisting---brilliant, alas; it has worked) readers and listeners are polarized, too. Leading to the amazing rise of blogs and citizen journalists (benign and vitriolic), to screaming TV "pundits"---and that the most respected "news" anchor is Jon Stewart.

Part of the preceding is the rise of personality in TV reporting---that purports to be news. Objectivity be damned. Yes, the news gets out, but distinctly filtered through a reporter's eyes. This came to a head, I think, after Hurricane Katrina. Think Anderson Cooper, of course, but also Nancy Grace and Rita Cosby. As a result of this sort of thing, I think TV viewers have come to expect such opinion and partisanship with their news. (And, hmmmm---should I even mention Wikipedia and the belief now that it's OK to go in and change truth for "truth"? What happened to John Seiganthaler's entry is a prime example. And thus lets people think that the truth doesn't matter.) (And then there's the cult of personality, which, of course, has been around for ages. But people's fascination with all things celebrity has meant that much less of what we call "news" is available on TV or in the newspaper. Think of the airtime and ink that has been wasted on the TomKat story.)

There's also this side effect---it may not be a direct result of Sept. 11, but it certainly came of age during the last 5 years, and it explains, partly, the muted skepticism and actual lieing (laying? I'll never keep these straight.) down and rolling over of so many journalists. It's the final ascendancy of journalism as Big Business, with more focus on a company's bottom line than on a paper doing what it's supposed to do---reporting the news and searching, if you will, for the truth and letting the people know. It's an insidious trickle-down effect that affects us all.

Finally, this might be a direct effect: How much harder it has become for foreign correspondents to do their jobs. They can't get out and about. And if they can't get out and about, how will the truth get out? And for the first time, they are targeted.

# re: Impact 9/11 has had on American journalism

Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:50 PM by Hugh Davis
Ms. Tatum,
Very thoughtful discourse and deft targeting of some causes for the decline of "big picture," relevant journalism.

This will sound harsh. Recall the McCarthy era when media was handmaiden to the communist scare? I am amazed that today's media, with so much more potential and resources, can be led by the nose, a nose that's so closely linked to some behinds that the minds don't work.

Today's SPJ LEADS talks about Keith Olbermann perhaps being in trouble for speaking truth to power (I'm allowed one cliche', right?) With few exceptions, we got no guts these days.

One remarkable exception is the LA Times editor fired for refusing to make cuts.

You were dead on illustrating our not understanding the impact of religion, even our own. Both Bin Laden and Bush are derived from that lack of understanding.

Hugh  
Anonymous comments are disabled. Please log in or create an account to comment on this article.