Welcome to SPJ Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

Dateline needs to rethink "Predator" series

I know. I know. I can be waaaay behind the pop-culture curve sometimes simply because I'm waaaay too focused on SPJ. :)

Only recently did I see for the first time an episode of NBC Dateline's popular "To Catch a Predator" series. The hubby was watching and asked me to put down my trusty laptop long enough to take in a few minutes of the program. He wanted to know what I made of the whole thing -- me being Miss Journalism-Ethics-Now-Journalism-Ethics-Forever and all.

Boy, was I disturbed -- just as much by what I consider all sorts of ethical problems with the "news-gathering" as by the creepy guys who were showing up at a house thinking they were going to score with a 14-year-old girl.

A student recently wrote to National Ethics Committee Chairman Gary Hill and me, asking what we made of this ongoing series. Gary, a longtime television broadcaster and director of investigations at KSTP-TV News in Minneapolis, did a masterful job of explaining his qualms about this series. I hope you'll read what he has written because he nicely covers many of my own sentiments.

It's important to note: Gary tackled this issue BEFORE a former county district attorney in Texas ensnared in a sting committed suicide Nov. 5. According to a story appearing in the Dallas Morning News, Dateline had no direct contact with the man -- but a crew was standing outside when he shot himself.

I suppose more journalists didn't make a bigger deal about this -- heck, I couldn't find even a mention of the suicide on Romenesko's rolling discussion -- because said suicide happened on a Sunday just before a hectic election week. The man's death -- no matter what kind of allegations he faced -- should make all of us rethink the merits of this kind of investigative reporting.

Published Tuesday, November 14, 2006 10:43 PM by christinetatum
Filed Under:

Comments

# re: Dateline needs to rethink "Predator" series

Wednesday, November 15, 2006 11:57 PM by christinetatum
Eagle-eyed SPJ member Karen Callaway, a former (and longtime) editor at the Chicago Tribune, noted that I wrote Gary Hill addressed "many of my sentiments." "'Many' is not all," she wrote, "What are your other sentiments?"

Here are two:

I wonder if the general public would give Dateline the same big thumbs up if it used similar tactics to ensare those involved in other types of crime.

Just about everyone reviles sexual predators of children, so they're easy targets for this sort of investigative journalism. But what would folks think if Dateline teamed with a group that used online chats to set up drug dealers, computer hackers/crackers and people looking for sex with adult prostitutes? Why doesn't Dateline team with citizen border patrols to bust illegal immigrants as they cross the border?

Dateline is focused on the tawdry "gotcha" aspects of unmasking would-be child molesters and appears to be missing (or is that disinterested in?) much bigger stories that might be of genuine public service.

As I watched an episode of the series, I couldn't help but think that some of the men featured appeared to be developmentally delayed, if not struggling with various mental-health problems (Point of disclosure: I'm married to a psychiatrist, and the encouragement of sound mental health is a BIG deal in my household). I'm willing to bet that a closer look at the men's childhoods/upbringing/medical history would reveal some striking patterns of common experience. By absolutely no means should any of that excuse their behavior -- but more thoughtful analysis might help the public understand some of the psychosocial factors that contribute to it. That better understanding might also help the public (and this is where my bias shows) more fully appreciate this nation's desperate need for more mental healthcare services, particularly for children.
Anonymous comments are disabled. Please log in or create an account to comment on this article.