Welcome to SPJ Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

Limited Online Anonymity Across The Pond

A recent case in England could have serious implications in the U.S. when it comes to posting online comments anonymously. 

It turns out some fans upset over their football (or soccer to the American crowd) team's management went to the Internet to anonymously voice their frustrations. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/oct/22/news.blogging

However, a judge ordered that the owner of the Web site must reveal the identities of three people because their postings were "reasonably be understood to allege greed, selfishness, untrustworthiness and dishonest behaviour."

Can you imagine if "Philly fans" were upset over the Eagles' play on the field and went after management and coaches for their decisions? Then again, they did boo "Santa Claus!?!

The question I pose is whether the case in England could have any effect here in the U.S.

A Web site out of Wilmington, N.C. has been a hot button of controversy over this type of issue. GossipReport.com (http://www.gossipreport.com/) allows anonymous users to post messages and photos. Basically, you have the option to say whatever you want about someone (within reason) and you have the anonymity of the Internet to protect you.

I know there are more Web sites out there that allow relative anonymity to its users. However, we live in a new America that allows people to express their opinions and hide behind the "firewall" of Internet immunity.

I would ask is that if you have a strong opinion to say something, you should have the same conviction to attach your name to it.

Published Friday, October 26, 2007 8:04 PM by KamalWallace

Comments

# gossipreport.com

Monday, January 21, 2008 5:27 PM by gossipreport.com
Anonymous comments are disabled. Please log in or create an account to comment on this article.