Ethics Answers
Is Public Affairs a Euphemism for Propaganda?
Each week, the Society of Professional Journalists National Ethics Committee receives dozens of requests for counsel and information concerning the Societys Journalism Ethics Code.
SPJ does not enforce the code in the sense of sanctioning journalists and news organizations that violate it. However, the Societys National Ethics Committee does not hesitate to identify ethical lapses in journalism and to disagree with those who have misinterpreted the code.
Committee members frequently investigate allegations of code violations and report their findings. Committee member Jerry Dunklee recently investigated a complaint lodged by a citizen who questioned the ethics of a television news segment about the Iraq War. The complaint and Dunklees findings are summarized here. Personally identifiable information has been removed.
The Original Complaint
Dear SPJ,
I would like to inform you about a television news segment ...
The story was the first of a two-part "Back from Iraq" sequence ... It featured a photographer for (the TV station), who was sent to Iraq as a member of the National Guard, and whose job with the Army is also as a journalist. His specific job, according to the piece, is as a "member of the mobile public affairs detachment.
My concern is that "public affairs" is a euphemism for propaganda, and that by essentially allowing (the photographer) to use (the TV station) as an extension of his Army job, (the station) is passing on propaganda as if it were news, similar to the "fake news" or "VNRs" which have caused so much controversy.
I believe this news segment certainly violates the intent, if not the letter of the Hinchey amendment to the Transportation, Treasury, HUD Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2006, which prohibits the federal government from entering into any contracts with writers and broadcasters or public relations experts to secretly create fake news that serves as government propaganda.
According to Congressman Hinchey, "A properly functioning democracy depends on a news media that is free of any conflicts-of-interest, especially with the government that it is supposed to be holding accountable."
(The photographer featured in the segment) is introduced as "a soldier who is also a reporter. If that is not a conflict of interest, I don't know what is.
It also violates The SPJ Code of Ethics, which clearly states: "Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the public's right to know." It also states: "Journalists should avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived." Being paid to promote a point of view in news stories or columns is never acceptable for ethical journalists.
The report itself is standard Bush administration propaganda, attempting to portray those who dissent with Bush policies as unpatriotic or even traitorous.
(The reporter of the segment): "Morale dips in ranks when the soldiers hear about antiwar protests back at home." (The photographer): "We are having a hard time winning the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people; we shouldn't have to win the hearts and minds of the American people." Both statements are voiceovers to images of local antiwar demonstrations.
I ask that you look into this matter and work with (the TV station) to improve their standards. I would hope that some corrective actions would include giving equal time to an alternative point of view ...
Dunklees Assessment
I have read the complaint from a viewer concerning ethics issues about a story ... I asked the viewer for a copy of the news story he felt was unethical. He sent the video to me, and I have viewed it several times.
I spoke on the phone and via e-mail with the television stations news director. I sent a her a copy of the complaint (without the name of the viewer at the viewers request) and asked for her response.
The viewer said he felt the story violated the SPJ Ethics Code in two ways. He writes:
It also violates The SPJ Code of Ethics, which clearly states: "Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the public's right to know." It also states: "Journalists should avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived." Being paid to promote a point of view in news stories or columns is never acceptable for ethical journalists.
The next portion of the code states: Disclose unavoidable conflicts.
It is my view that (the TV station) clearly disclosed that the subject of the story was an employee on leave from the station. The anchors said that. The reporter did as well. It is clear that the subject of the story, (a station photographer), is a soldier working as a reporter in Iraq for the Army and not reporting for (the station). (This story is one part of a two-part series on local people who are serving or have served in Iraq.)
The viewer charges that (the station) is permitting propaganda to be passed off as news. It is clear that (the photographer) has a point of view. Hes entitled to one, of course. And the reporter says in a voice over that (the photographers) perspective may be colored by his job. (The reporter) also reports that (the photographer) said there are no simple solutions in Iraq.
It is my view that the report did not violate the SPJ ethics code because (the station) clearly disclosed the subjects connection to the station and pointed out that his views were his own. I dont think the average viewer would have been confused about these issues.
The viewer asserts that the report was also a violation of law in relation to the federal government producing fake news or Video News Releases with tax dollars. SPJ has taken a strong position in opposition to government producing such material or news operations airing it without clear labeling. This story does not appear to be a violation of our position on government-produced news. But SPJ is not in the business of law enforcement, and alleged violations of law should be forwarded to the proper authorities.
The viewers complaint is articulate, and I applaud (the viewer) for following through on these concerns. The war is controversial, and a good news operation should attempt to cover all sides. I am not in a position to know if (the station) has followed this basic tenet of good journalism throughout the war. But this story does not rise to the level of a violation of the SPJ Ethics Code.
For more information about SPJs Code of Ethics, write to ethics@spj.org.
Copyright © 1996-2013 Society of Professional Journalists. All Rights Reserved. Legal
Society of Professional Journalists
Eugene S. Pulliam National Journalism Center, 3909 N. Meridian St., Indianapolis, IN 46208
317/927-8000 | Fax: 317/920-4789 | Contact SPJ Headquarters | Employment Opportunities | Advertise with SPJ