Twitter Facebook Google Plus Pinterest Storify
Society of Professional Journalists
Improving and protecting journalism since 1909

Advertise with SPJ

SPJ Leads

News and More
Click to Expand Instantly

SPJ News
Events and Deadlines
SPJ Blogs
Quill Online
Journalist's Toolbox

Stay in Touch
Twitter Storify Facebook Google Plus
RSS Pinterest Pinterest Flickr

More Articles
Main listing | Archive

News: SPJ joins amicus brief in New Jersey public records case
News: SPJ joins amicus brief in Texas biker shootout case
News: SPJ joins letter in 'right to be forgotten' internet order
News: SPJ joins amicus brief in NYPD public records case
Quill: From the President
Quill: Ten with Fiona Macleod

Freedom of Information
Covering Prisons
Project Sunshine: Find FOI Help
Accessing Government Records
Shield Law Campaign
FOI Audit Tookit | PDF
Anti-SLAPP: Protect Free Speech
Official Secrets Act bill
FOI Groups
Annual FOI Reports
FOI Committee Roster

FOI FYI: SPJ’s FOI Committee Blog
Show why FOI matters
FOI Win in Georgia: Defamation Law Repealed
The flow of information: Reporting on water in the west

FOI Committee
This committee is the watchdog of press freedoms across the nation. It relies upon a network of volunteers in each state organized under Project Sunshine. These SPJ members are on the front lines for assaults to the First Amendment and when lawmakers attempt to restrict the public's access to documents and the government's business. The committee often is called upon to intervene in instances where the media is restricted.

Freedom of Information Committee Chair

Jonathan Anderson
Public issues investigative reporter
Marshfield News-Herald
Marshfield, Wisc.
Phone: 920-676-5399
Bio (click to expand) picture Jonathan Anderson is a public issues investigative reporter for the Marshfield News-Herald in Marshfield, Wisconsin. Before joining the News-Herald, in 2015, Jonathan was a reporter for a pair of newspapers in northern Wisconsin for nearly two years. He has held internships at the First Amendment Center, Wisconsin Law Journal, Wisconsin Public Radio and WISN-TV, and was also editor in chief of his college newspaper, the UWM Post.

Jonathan is an avid requester of public records, and his work in the FOI arena has also entailed advocacy and research. He has been the plaintiff in two lawsuits challenging improper government secrecy. He helped obtain a legal opinion from the Wisconsin attorney general that found University of Wisconsin System student government groups subject to the state’s open meetings law. His master’s thesis, “Resolving Public Records Disputes in Wisconsin: The Role of the Attorney General's Office,” investigated how the Wisconsin attorney general reviews and sometimes intervenes in access disputes. And he has volunteered for the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council.

Reading Room
Freedom of Information
First Amendment/
Public & the Press

Articles for...
Young Journalists
International Journalists

Home > Freedom of Information > Reading Room > University’s FOI project yields scary results

SPJ Reading Room


University’s FOI project yields scary results

By Bill Reader

As a professor at a public university, my professional life is an open book. My résumé is public, my salary is public, my promotion and tenure file is public, students’ evaluations of my teaching is public, even my e-mail is public. The public has a right to see the list of phone calls I make every month, what I said for the minutes of faculty meetings, and how I spend my department’s money.

I knew all of that going in to this line of work. But I sense that very few employees at public colleges really think about that transparency, and, when asked to reveal such details, often react with suspicion and resistance.

It was with that culture of confidentiality in mind that students in our campus chapter of SPJ decided to tackle an open-records audit — university style.

The goal was to see how well the public four-year schools in Ohio would accommodate public-records requests. But rather than work as journalists through media-relations experts, we wanted to test Sunshine Law compliance among the rank-and-file employees of those public offices.

We expected low compliance, but certainly not to the degree we found. Having sought 88 total records across 15 campuses in the state, offices provided access to records just 41 percent of the time — and 17 percent of the requests were granted only after students identified themselves and their reasons for seeking the records, which is not required under Ohio’s Public Records Act.

Nearly a third of the requests were denied outright, either because office workers didn’t know whether a record was for the public or, sometimes, because they thought such information simply wasn’t for public review. More than a quarter of the documents couldn’t be obtained due to closed offices and absent personnel, even though the audit was conducted during normal business hours, and Ohio law makes the public office — not a designated individual in that office — responsible for providing the records.

All the records we sought were deemed to be public records by a Sunshine Law attorney of our state’s newspaper association. We sought the records in the offices most likely to keep that information (the law says even incomplete computer files are public record). Students were to identify themselves and their purposes only if they were told that was the only way they could gain access to the records.

Not surprisingly, the public relations folks at many of the schools were critical of our audit. One even told a major newspaper in the state that the audit was “shoddily done” because we didn’t go straight to the media-relations office. I think that fellow missed the point and might want to treat the cause of his campus’s FOI illness.

The audit itself was a great project for a campus chapter. In all, we had about two dozen members serve as auditors, reporters and editors. Because our school has students from all over the state, the students were able to do the audit over their winter break (although they made sure the university offices were supposed to be open on the days they did the audit). Because it was going to take almost a full academic year to plan, conduct, and report on the audit, and would require students to work on it during winter and spring breaks, the project worked far better for SPJ than it would have for a set class.

One thing that helped is that I had participated in three public-records audits before — two in Pennsylvania, one in Ohio — so I knew essentially how to set up such things, and also what problems auditors likely would face. A huge help is that I have a strong professional relationship with our state press association, the director of which was more than happy to provide free legal review of our project to make sure the records we were seeking actually were public records.

One of the challenges was helping students overcome their natural anxiety about conducting the audit and, more daunting, helping them overcome their instincts to identify themselves as reporters from the get-go. We used several role-playing training sessions (with me as the “grumpy secretary”) to help them practice before the audit.

The best part of the project, though, was that the whole chapter of about 75 students spent a whole year getting hands-on experience with FOI issues. And for the two dozen who worked on the project? They certainly will have a lifelong devotion to keeping the public’s information public.

Bill Reader is a professor and SPJ chapter advisor at the E.W. Scripps School of Journalism at Ohio University.
Copyright © 1996-2015 Society of Professional Journalists. All Rights Reserved. Legal

Society of Professional Journalists
Eugene S. Pulliam National Journalism Center
3909 N. Meridian St.
Indianapolis, IN 46208
317/927-8000 | Fax: 317/920-4789

Contact SPJ Headquarters
Employment Opportunities
Advertise with SPJ