Awards
The Black Hole Award
Deadline for nominations: February 26, 2024
Previous winners
2024
North Carolina General Assembly
Read news release
2023
Mark Fox Administration of the Three Affiliated Tribes
Read news release
2022
Idaho Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin
Read news release
2021
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry
Read news release
2020
Connecticut State Police
Read news release
2018
President Donald Trump and his administration
Read news release
2017
New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission
Read news release
2015
U.S. Virgin Islands government
Read news release
2014
U.S. Forest Service
Read news release
2013
Oklahoma State University
Read news release
2012
The Georgia Legislatures 2008 law and 2011 amendments to that law providing tax credits for private schools
Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Wisconsin State Legislature
Read news release
2011
Utah Legislature and Governor Gary Herbert
Read news release
The Society of Professional Journalists launched the Black Hole Award to highlight the most heinous violations of the public's right to know.
By exposing such abuses, SPJs Freedom of Information Committee seeks to educate the public about their rights and call attention to those who would interfere with openness and transparency.
Nomination criteria
Black Hole Award nominations should meet the following criteria:
1. Violation, in spirit or letter, of any federal, state, or Indigenous Nation open-government law. This means either a clear violation of the statute governing access to public records or public meetings, or using an ambiguity or loophole in the law to avoid having to comply with the law. For example: conducting multiple meetings with small groups that do not constitute a quorum, email discussions outside the public view, or charging unreasonable amounts to copy documents.
2. Egregiousness. In order to maintain the effectiveness of the Black Hole Award, it should not be given for just any openness violation. Recipients should know they are trampling on the publics right, placing personal or political interests ahead of the public good or endangering public welfare. Examples might include an agency or official who attempted to keep information secret to avoid embarrassment or hide misdeeds.
3. Impact. The case should be one that affects the public rather than an individual. The award should not be used to settle vendettas against recalcitrant bureaucrats. Withholding information should hurt the general public rather than an individual.
SPJs Freedom of Information Committee welcomes nominations from local SPJ chapters, SPJ members, other journalists and private citizens.
Nominations should include, where possible, supporting documentation. Documentation can include any of the following:
News coverage of the violation.
Public records chronicling the dispute.
Legal papers if there was a lawsuit or other legal action involved in the matter.
Any expert opinion from an attorney, official or open-government expert that the violation occurred.
Contact information for the parties involved to allow the committee to obtain more information if needed, including from the government official.
How to submit your nomination
Please email nominations to SPJs communications team.
Nominations are due February 26.