– Excellence in Feature Video/Streaming
– Excellence in News Video/Streaming
– Excellence in College Gaming Journalism
– Excellence in Feature Writing
– Excellence in News Reporting
– Worst Story of the Year: Read about "Worst Story of the Year" by clicking here.
Excellence in News Reporting
A Gamer's Guide to the 2016 Presidential Election: Video Game Violence, by Brad Glasgow, Allthink
Judges conclusions: For arguably the most important Kunkel Award, this was an imperfect choice amid weak competition. Griped one judge...
This guy wins the triple challenge: Bury your lead, bury your sourcing, bury your thesis. Fuck. But he got interviews and data and builds a case.
Another judge was less profane but still underwhelmed...
Beating to death something you already admit has been beaten to death with a nine-paragraph rehash? I could've done with one or two.
I also really, really don't care as a reader how hard it was for you to get answers from the candidates. I actually snorted at this: "I sent emails to the Clinton, Trump, Johnson, Stein, and later on the McMullin campaigns. This turned out to be an arduous task, as I'm sure you can imagine." No one cares about your struggle to GET the story. They only care about THE STORY.
That said, kudos for doing original reporting and seriously researching the issue. Journalism is the most important thing and harder to come by while tight, compelling writing is secondary and probably easier to learn.
Our third judge just flat-out liked it...
The first-person perspective actually works here because it's not about his feelings. He's explaining how he acquired his sources. This story wins for me with just the sourcing alone. Who else thinks to reach out to presidential candidates about video games?
Judges comment: I would've picked this to win if it wasn't even more muddled than Gamer's Guide. There's so much sourcing, and I absolutely love that the writer fact-checked LA Weekly. If this guy gets a handle on presenting stories in more compelling packages, he'll be a powerhouse.
NO THIRD PLACE AWARDED
Excellence in Feature Writing
First Place (TIE):
– Imposter syndrome: Game developers who feel like frauds, by Richard Moss, Polygon
– Punktendo: The 8-bit punk games you didnt play, by Ben Sailer, Kill Screen
Judges conclusions: Two very different articles by two very different websites. (Polygon was funded by Vox Media, Kill Screen by Kickstarter.) But judges adored both. About the Polygon story...
I love the art, the quotes and anecdotes, the angle and scope, and the clean (by which I mean unpretentious and jargon-free) writing. I never felt like this piece was overstaying its welcome or straying from its purpose, and I felt one of those two things about almost everything else on this list.
About the Kill Screen story...
I mean, pixels and counterculture, I'm in regardless. But I really like the lengths taken here to avoid casting Hong's work as a nostalgia trip or merely sprite-hacking, while also fairly leveling the criticism that the artistic impact is limited by the fact the gameplay is untouched from the originals. That takes some juggling, especially to not lose the reader along the way.
Judges comment: I really like this because it's something I've never heard about and the story addresses some preconceptions while dangling some surprising tidbits, too. It says up front it's based on interviewing several developers, so Im turned off by any unattributed assertions.
Judges comment: Yes, Playboy magazine proving once again that good gaming coverage can happen anywhere.
Excellence in College Gaming Journalism
Judges conclusions: Aiden Strawhun was a student at Florida Gulf Coast University in Fort Myers, where among other things, she wrote about games for her student newspaper. She also covered her gaming community for a local news website called the Lee Herald. Thats probably why one judge called this obviously good and another simply declared, My top pick. Strawhun is now a pro reporter at the Naples Herald.
But the third judge wasnt impressed with the misleading headline...
Let it also be known that I thoroughly enjoyed the EagleLAN piece and would have put it in my top 3. I decided not to because the headline has seemingly nothing to do with the content of the story. I'd look at the headline and expect coverage on the event. What I got instead was profiles on several of the players. There's nothing wrong with players discussing how esports should be on ESPN, but it becomes a problem when you're marketing a different story via the headline.
Heres a secret journalists know but normal people dont: Reporters dont often get to write their own headlines. Editors do. Its quite common for reporters to roll out of bed, blearily look up their own stories on their phones or computers, and curse the asshole who dropped a misleading headline on top of their byline.
So Strawhun wins for excelling at her job, even if her editors didnt. Sadly, none of the other entries excelled enough to be propelled into second or third place.
NO SECOND OR THIRD PLACE AWARDED
Excellence in News Video/Streaming
Judges conclusions: In a category swollen with opinion and starving for news, this Kotaku video was the clear winner and the only one. The judges couldnt be persuaded to choose a second and third place. As one insisted...
I can say without any issue that my only nomination for a winner is the NSFW Skyrim/Fallout piece which identifies an issue, quantifies and qualifies it, and answers questions. There's data. There's fucking journalism with the viewer in mind, seemingly unlike so many other nominees. Mind your audience and ask yourself: Does this sentence give anything to my reader? If the answer is no, throw it out.
Another judge added, There's research and not just sourcing from the subject themselves, but another modder as well. On top of that, it's investigative and attempts to balance both sides.
If only more journalists could do the same both in the gaming world and in the rest of the world.
NO SECOND OR THIRD PLACE AWARDED
Excellence in Feature Video/Streaming
Judges conclusions: With nearly 100,000 YouTube subscribers, NoClip aka Danny ODwyer started producing crowd-funded gaming documentaries only last year. This one impressed the Kunkel judges in a category they otherwise declared underwhelming.
Brought in legitimate sources, which scored Noclip major brownie points. Weaved the quotes/commentary into their angle well. Between analysis, interviews and visuals, the video was actually entertaining to watch making it stand out from some other entries that bored me to pieces with a lack of style.
Said another simply: Interesting story idea, clear angle, sources up front. While DOOM Resurrected was the unanimous winner, the judges couldn't agree on the runners-up, splitting 2-1 on each.
SECOND PLACE: Morality in the Mechanics, by Mark Brown
Judges comment: Mark Brown either put a lot of effort into researching each game or completely fooled me. The major drawback is his need to zero in on a clear angle from the beginning. Brown eventually backs up his point with game analysis and secondary sources, but lacks any interviews with actual people.
THIRD PLACE: A Day With Keiichiro Toyama by toco toco tv
Judges comment: Thank God somebody submitted a profile, taking an in-depth look into a story rarely told.