Please note: Some of SPJ's websites, including its blog network and the Journalist's Toolbox, are currently down following some unexpected activity that knocked them offline. They will return later this week at the latest. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Member Login | Join SPJ | Benefits | Rates

> Latest News, Blogs and Events (tap to expand)


Advertisement
— ADVERTISEMENT —
Advertise with SPJ
1

SPJ Leads


News and More
Click to Expand Instantly

SPJ News
SPJ Blogs
Quill Online
Journalist's Toolbox

— ADVERTISEMENT —


Stay in Touch
Twitter Storify Facebook Google Plus
RSS Pinterest Pinterest Flickr


More SPJ News
Press Notes
Publications
SPJ Blogs
Quill
SPJ Leads
The EIJ News
Press Notes
SPJ News
Open Doors
Geneva Conventions
Annual FOI Reports

Home > SPJ News > SPJ opposes Ill. law limiting coverage of police conduct

SPJ News
Latest SPJ News | RSS


SPJ opposes Ill. law limiting coverage of police conduct


4/25/2011


For Immediate Release:

Contacts:
Hagit Limor, SPJ President, (513) 852-4012,
hlimor@spj.org
Andrew M. Scott, SPJ Communications Coordinator, (317) 927-8000 ext. 215,
ascott@spj.org

INDIANAPOLIS Ė The Society of Professional Journalists strongly supports the American Civil Liberties Unionís efforts to contest an Illinois law limiting citizensí and journalistsí right to gather information in the public domain.

The ACLU of Illinois is challenging the constitutionality of a federal court ruling that claims the First Amendment does not guarantee the right to publically record police officers engaged in their duties. An amicus brief, which SPJ joined, was authored and filed April 22 by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Under the Illinois Eavesdropping Act, a citizen or journalist using a cell phone or video camera to record police conduct, even if on a public street, could be subject to criminal prosecution. The case, ACLU v. Alvarez, is on appeal to the 7th Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago.

The Reporters Committee brief argues that the Illinois statute is unconstitutional because there is a well-established First Amendment right to gather information in the public domain. The brief cites numerous examples within the past few years where the law would cause potentially harmful implications on newsgathering.

In one of its roles as a free press and free speech advocate, SPJ initiates and joins amicus briefs to support First Amendment and open records cases. Most recently, SPJ joined a brief seeking to support of a case challenging the constitutionality of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act.

Founded in 1909 as Sigma Delta Chi, SPJ promotes the free flow of information vital to a well-informed citizenry; works to inspire and educate the next generation of journalists; and protects First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and press. For more information about SPJ, please visit www.spj.org.

-END-

Stay in Touch
Twitter Storify Facebook Google Plus RSS Pinterest Pinterest
Flickr LinkedIn Tout


More SPJ News
Press Notes
Publications
SPJ Blogs
Quill
SPJ Leads
The EIJ News
Press Notes
SPJ News
Open Doors
Geneva Conventions
Annual FOI Reports
 

Copyright © 1996-2016 Society of Professional Journalists. All Rights Reserved. Legal

Society of Professional Journalists
Eugene S. Pulliam National Journalism Center
3909 N. Meridian St.
Indianapolis, IN 46208
317/927-8000 | Fax: 317/920-4789

Contact SPJ Headquarters
Employment Opportunities
Advertise with SPJ