The First Amendment is under attack. Fight back with us. Visit fight.spj.org to find out how.

Member Login | Join SPJ | Benefits | Rates

> Latest News, Blogs and Events (tap to expand)


Advertise with SPJ
— ADVERTISEMENT —
Advertise with SPJ
2

News and More
Click to Expand Instantly

Journalist's Toolbox

— ADVERTISEMENT —


Stay in Touch
Twitter Storify Facebook Google Plus
RSS Pinterest Pinterest Flickr



Current Issue
Browse Archive
About Quill
Advertising Info
Back Issue Request
Reprint Permission Form
Pulliam/Kilgore Internship Info

Search Quill


Publications
SPJ Blogs
Quill
SPJ Leads
The EIJ News
Press Notes
SPJ News
Open Doors
Geneva Conventions
Annual FOI Reports

Home > Publications > Quill > Caution: Runaway metaphor alert


Current Issue | Browse Archive | About Quill | Advertising Info
Back Issues | Reprint Permission Form

Search Quill


Thursday, September 27, 2007
Caution: Runaway metaphor alert

Paula LaRocque

Mixed, mangled or overdone metaphor is a leading contender for the Silly Little Mistake That Stops Readers Dead in Their Tracks Award.

Consider this from a newspaper story: “She realized she had been walking blindly through life, mired in a void.” It’s “mired in a void” that stops you. You can be mired in, well, a mire. But a void is an empty space. Can you be mired in an empty space? And if so, what is it that’s miring you, exactly? Not much, come to think of it: This passage says she had been walking, not mired.

News writing is littered with such failed attempts at colorful expression — expression that makes readers marvel or, worse, laugh. On the one hand, you want to say at least they’re trying. And on the other, you want to say ewwww.

Take this metaphor (please): “Pus still oozed from the unhealed wounds of the Black Hawk Indian War as young James entered boyhood.”

Here’s a handful of missed metaphors from newspapers:

l “Perhaps because of labor’s weakened condition, managements with iron fists are lifting the sword for the final kill.” This sentence shows why successful metaphor sticks with a single governing image. You can skip the iron fists if you have a sword.

l “The conductor navigated Verdi’s Requiem with the touch of a surgeon.” Navigate is a seafaring term, so related expression must likewise be seafaring — for example: navigated the shoals of Verdi’s Requiem with the skill of a sea captain. Surgeon, however, is a medical term, so it mixes the metaphor.

l “The dirty trick is a scenario that some Republicans hope they can pull out of the mothballs yet again.” This metaphor goes a couple steps too far by mixing a figurative scenario with figurative mothballs. First, a dirty trick is not a “scenario,” even figuratively speaking. A scenario is a synopsis of a play, a libretto of an opera, a shooting script of a screenplay, etc. So it’s not a successful metaphor for a dirty trick. And it’s probably too much to pull a dirty trick from the mothballs, let alone a scenario.

l “Mazursky could have woven an enchanting fable from the fabric of Shakespeare’s ‘Tempest,’ except for one thing: A fable should be short and sweet.” We don’t weave something from a fabric, we weave something into a fabric. Metaphorically more sensible: “Mazursky could have woven an enchanting fable from the threads of Shakespeare’s ‘Tempest.’”

l “All of these factors have combined to transform the company, a high-flying success story just a few months ago, into a large question mark whose future is cloudy.” A question mark with a cloudy future?

l “We hump snail-like to our end, leaving in our wake no trace of having been here.” The difficulty here is twofold: We’re not snail-like if we leave “no trace”; snails leave a trail of slime. Further, a wake (the track left in water by a vessel or other body) also is a “trace,” so this incomprehensible metaphor says we’ve left no trace in our trace.

l “His writing slides into your head like a fine oyster.” Well, gag us with a simile. To work, this metaphor must at least be completed: His writing slides into your head like an oyster slides down your gullet. Uncompleted, it can be misunderstood: slides into your head like an oyster slides into your head. But, completed, it’s all too much, isn’t it, this talk of oysters, fine or otherwise, sliding into your head.

l “There are plenty of close-ups of the slimy lizard . . . a sinister little armored tank of a reptile.” The tank metaphor is fine, but lizards are scaly, not slimy. (Snails and oysters are slimy.)

Mixed and overheated metaphors in the media are so common that The New Yorker often features them in an item called “Block That Metaphor!” Here’s one such from the Chicago Tribune: “So now what we are dealing with is the rubber meeting the road, and instead of biting the bullet on these issues, we just want to punt.”

That sentence makes us laugh because of its plethora of imagery. We have an image from drag racing, plus an image of biting down on something hard while a rustic doctor digs an arrowhead (or the like) from our torsos, plus the football image of the punt. Good metaphor helps speed the message along; it deepens and intensifies content. But bad metaphor keeps us so busy with mechanic that we lose sight of meaning.

Stay in Touch
Twitter Storify Facebook Google Plus RSS Pinterest Pinterest
Flickr LinkedIn Tout



Current Issue
Browse Archive
About Quill
Advertising Info
Back Issue Request
Reprint Permission Form
Pulliam/Kilgore Internship Info

Search Quill


Publications
SPJ Blogs
Quill
SPJ Leads
The EIJ News
Press Notes
SPJ News
Open Doors
Geneva Conventions
Annual FOI Reports

Copyright © 1996-2017 Society of Professional Journalists. All Rights Reserved.

Legal | Policies

Society of Professional Journalists
Eugene S. Pulliam National Journalism Center
3909 N. Meridian St., Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46208
317/927-8000 | Fax: 317/920-4789

Contact SPJ Headquarters
Employment Opportunities
Advertise with SPJ